Web3 can sometimes feel like a very exclusive club in itself. The velvet ropes are complex jargon, exorbitant gas fees, and a user experience that seems intentionally designed to confuse anyone over 30. So when Enso Network shows up, claiming to dismantle silos, it’s understandable if your blood starts pumping. With new ideas, extremely helpful skepticism tends to come along as well. Fundamentally, is this what’s going to unlock Web3 for everybody? Or is it simply another shiny object leading us astray from the true purpose?

Web3's Inclusivity Problem: Solved?

Make no mistake, the current Web3 landscape is less inclusive than it might initially appear to be. It’s an amusement park for the technologically advanced and the costly elite. Just picture trying to convince your grandma to install MetaMask, bridge tokens between chains, all the while explaining impermanent loss. Just the appearance of complete shock says everything.

Ensos Network’s Shortcuts – pre-configured transaction templates – are marketed as the answer. Think of them as Web3 macros. Rather than try to figure out a maze of bridges and RPCs, you can make advanced multi-chain transactions with one click. This is huge. That’s like moving from hand coded assembly language to a drag and drop website creator. Then all of a sudden, Web3 is no longer just for the coders.

Making something more accessible is not the same as actually making it accessible. The continued success of Shortcuts will depend on community adoption. Will developers and users really contribute to developing, sharing and improving these templates? How will they be designed—to truly be accessible to a wide public, or to the few already considered initiated? The answer to that question is profoundly important. It will show us if Enso Network truly democratizes Web3 or simply provides a slightly easier path to the same gated community.

Shortcuts to Empowerment or Exploitation?

The potential that Enso Network has to empower marginalized communities is infinitely more exciting. Now imagine a farmer outside of the developed world. He is able to easily access DeFi lending protocols through a quick formula, bypassing the pitfalls placed by predatory legacy lenders. Or a telecom entrepreneur routing a Shortcut to easily receive and send money across borders, eliminating unnecessary banking fees. This is where Web3’s promise of financial inclusion can truly be fulfilled.

There's a darker side to consider. Like every other powerful tool, they can likewise be used for good or evil. Shortcuts are a hugely valuable tool. What’s preventing anyone from making a Shortcut that will deceive users and make them unknowingly approve malicious transactions? Shortcuts specifically intended to front-run trades or take advantage of weaknesses in DeFi protocols are a different story. The decentralized nature of Enso Network necessitates that these safeguards and community oversight are required to avoid these predatory scenarios.

We need to ask ourselves: are we building a system that empowers individuals, or one that simply creates new opportunities for exploitation? Perhaps the most fundamental answer is in the governance mechanisms of Enso Network and the community ethics of its participants.

Can Tokenomics Truly Incentivize Good?

The $ENSO token is the lifeblood of the network’s ecosystem. Its monetary policy underpins payment of required network fees, rewards those that help secure the network, and fuels governance decisions. The thinking is that by rewarding the right kind of activity, the tokenomics will help create a strong, active, and positive community.

We've seen time and time again that tokenomics alone aren't enough. There are many DAOs where governance is captured by whales. These decisions time and time again place quick profit motives ahead of the overall good of the community for generations. The ideal of decentralized governance can prove to be a false promise when economic incentives are out of whack.

Will $ENSO really give the end users the control they need to influence the future direction of the network? Or will it simply further concentrate power in the hands of the wealthy 1%? Are the potential benefits of producing and publishing Shortcuts enough to incentivize a diverse group of creators to jump in? Or will these benefits be accessible only to the well-resourced and well-connected?

The success of Enso Network is packed in its technology. It definitely shines because of the passionate community it fosters and its truly deep commitment to inclusivity. If it can succeed at creating a deeply collaborative and equitable ecosystem in the process, it has the potential to be a true game-changer. If it follows the same tracks that have marred the rest of Web3, it’s destined to flop. Greed, exclusivity, and the absence of ethics will make it just another shiny object, soon headed for the dustbin of history. The choice, as always, is ours.

Don't just sit on the sidelines. Join us, discover Enso Network, and help shape the story. Let's shape the future of Web3 together, ensuring that it's a future that benefits everyone, not just a select few.